Post by account_disabled on Jan 23, 2024 19:46:11 GMT 9.5
There are two polar opinions: some believe that it is better to hire experts, others think that the main thing is that a person knows how to work with text, and the rest will be added. I believe that the truth, as always, lies in the middle. It can be easier to work with an author who is in the topic He can write a text faster, and often better, than someone who does not understand the topic. Especially if these are texts for experts, and the subject matter is complex. For example, let's take technical topics . When an author does not understand basic things, it is more difficult for him to work with the material. For example, in order to write an article about a specific technology together with an IT specialist, he will have to understand from the very beginning - starting with what kind of technology it is.
Also, he does not always understand what exactly it is worth C Level Executive List asking an expert. But an author with a technical background knows the basic concepts - he just needs to understand the nuances. Or another example: I studied medicine, it is easier for me to work with medical texts . Of course, I am not always up to date with modern treatment protocols and many other nuances - you have to look for and ask experts. But I don't need to understand the basics, like googling disease names or symptoms, to understand what the doctor is talking about. And I also know where and how to look for the necessary information. It works in all complex niches like IT , law , medicine . If a person was a lawyer, he has the skill to understand documents and laws. If a person was a backend developer, it is easier for him to write an article about databases - he knows how they work.
Past experience does not guarantee that the author will succeed Sometimes the author remembers something from the past, is sure of the correctness of the data, but in fact everything has changed a long time ago. For example, some drugs were previously prescribed, and then removed from the recommendations due to ineffectiveness. The author remembers them, but does not think to check. This is where past experience gets in the way. And, of course, a person who does not do something in practice will not write a good text based only on old knowledge. Usually you need either the help of an existing expert, or the ability to find the necessary information, the skills of a scientific journalist. And many authors do not know how to work with experts and search for information. For example, they do not use English-language sources, although there are the most recent and reliable data on many topics.
Also, he does not always understand what exactly it is worth C Level Executive List asking an expert. But an author with a technical background knows the basic concepts - he just needs to understand the nuances. Or another example: I studied medicine, it is easier for me to work with medical texts . Of course, I am not always up to date with modern treatment protocols and many other nuances - you have to look for and ask experts. But I don't need to understand the basics, like googling disease names or symptoms, to understand what the doctor is talking about. And I also know where and how to look for the necessary information. It works in all complex niches like IT , law , medicine . If a person was a lawyer, he has the skill to understand documents and laws. If a person was a backend developer, it is easier for him to write an article about databases - he knows how they work.
Past experience does not guarantee that the author will succeed Sometimes the author remembers something from the past, is sure of the correctness of the data, but in fact everything has changed a long time ago. For example, some drugs were previously prescribed, and then removed from the recommendations due to ineffectiveness. The author remembers them, but does not think to check. This is where past experience gets in the way. And, of course, a person who does not do something in practice will not write a good text based only on old knowledge. Usually you need either the help of an existing expert, or the ability to find the necessary information, the skills of a scientific journalist. And many authors do not know how to work with experts and search for information. For example, they do not use English-language sources, although there are the most recent and reliable data on many topics.