Post by account_disabled on Feb 27, 2024 18:06:36 GMT 9.5
The obscene spectacle of the PP is nothing more than an exclusive and naked struggle for power. married couple Carlos Sotos CARLOS SOTOS FEBRUARY 18, 2022, We need your help to continue reporting Become a member of Nuevatribuna In power struggles there are those who find themselves on the brink of the abyss. But he always takes a step forward. Something of that seems to be happening in the Popular Party. They say about this almost tavern brawl that it is the biggest crisis known since its founding. As our perspectives on what is happening in contemporary Spanish history barely reach a few editorials from recent weeks buried by the avalanche of digitalized opinions, the term crisis, with a capital letter, is used in politics as well as in sports competition. All it takes is one poorly negotiated match in the Roman football circus and we already have it magnified orbi et orbe. Because the obscene spectacle of these months and especially the one carried out yesterday by the leaders of the Popular Party, is not even remotely the foundation of the crisis of the Spanish right, but only one of its most grotesque consequences and falsely recognized as "politics.
This is nothing other than an exclusive and naked struggle for power in the form of inheritance distribution, or disposition of a position, or an asset. Phenomena that occur equally in a family, a community of co-owners, a commercial company, a soccer club, a religious congregation, a professional association or in a court. And anyone who looks back and introspectively Guatemala Mobile Number List at their own life and social relationships knows this to be true. So, as in the famous question about the dilemma between love and sex, we will have to ask ourselves why they call it politics when they only practice the use of power and the division of assets. In this media spectacle, as if it were a Tartufian vaudeville by Moliere, characters appear, expelling true smoke screens to hide ethically, morally and legally unacceptable realities. Can you imagine, for example, what would be happening if a President of the Autonomous Community of the PSOE had awarded a contract without bidding or public competition to a company for the acquisition of protective masks, at a time as dramatic as the pandemic, for an amount of.
Million euros and his brother would have obtained 283,000 euros from “intermediation”? How many media robes would have been torn? What lies or is commercially justified a 19% intermediation for a transaction of this type? What profit margin has the supply company had to pay this exorbitant infrequent commission? What was the final price of the unit purchased with public funds and what would have been the fair price that would have advised its acquisition for reasons of urgency? These are questions that are relevant, because at that time one of the issues that publicly confronted the CAM presidency with the “Sanchez” Government was precisely the “urgency” in obtaining supplies and the delay in their acquisition that the “ centralized purchasing” by the national government. Remember? Do you remember that negotiations were initiated by some regional governments with international suppliers of medical supplies? What interests circulated then and are now manifested so crudely? These are issues that have nothing to do with politics beyond the incorrect, abusive and self-serving exercise of power that affects both public administration and private companies.
This is nothing other than an exclusive and naked struggle for power in the form of inheritance distribution, or disposition of a position, or an asset. Phenomena that occur equally in a family, a community of co-owners, a commercial company, a soccer club, a religious congregation, a professional association or in a court. And anyone who looks back and introspectively Guatemala Mobile Number List at their own life and social relationships knows this to be true. So, as in the famous question about the dilemma between love and sex, we will have to ask ourselves why they call it politics when they only practice the use of power and the division of assets. In this media spectacle, as if it were a Tartufian vaudeville by Moliere, characters appear, expelling true smoke screens to hide ethically, morally and legally unacceptable realities. Can you imagine, for example, what would be happening if a President of the Autonomous Community of the PSOE had awarded a contract without bidding or public competition to a company for the acquisition of protective masks, at a time as dramatic as the pandemic, for an amount of.
Million euros and his brother would have obtained 283,000 euros from “intermediation”? How many media robes would have been torn? What lies or is commercially justified a 19% intermediation for a transaction of this type? What profit margin has the supply company had to pay this exorbitant infrequent commission? What was the final price of the unit purchased with public funds and what would have been the fair price that would have advised its acquisition for reasons of urgency? These are questions that are relevant, because at that time one of the issues that publicly confronted the CAM presidency with the “Sanchez” Government was precisely the “urgency” in obtaining supplies and the delay in their acquisition that the “ centralized purchasing” by the national government. Remember? Do you remember that negotiations were initiated by some regional governments with international suppliers of medical supplies? What interests circulated then and are now manifested so crudely? These are issues that have nothing to do with politics beyond the incorrect, abusive and self-serving exercise of power that affects both public administration and private companies.